As perhaps the most famous dissenter, Justice Scalia knows how to craft a barb . And he’s not alone. The Columbus Dispatch describes the “pointed language” of dissents written by justices of the Ohio Supreme Court. The Dispatch reports, for example: “ In June, [Justice] Pfeifer took issue with a majority opinion that relied on a statute containing a 307-word sentence by writing a one-sentence dissent: 300-plus words to lampoon the ‘24 lines of unrelenting abstruseness.’” Vociferous dissents may be fun to read, but how useful are they? Here are a few resources for exploring this type of judicial opinion: Justice Ginsberg offers her views on The Role of Dissenting Opinions in a lecture published by the Minnesota Law Review . PBS offers discussion of several “famous dissents,” including dissenting opinions in Korematsu and Dred Scott . Check out some of our titles, like Scalia Dissents and Foreshadows of the Law: Supreme Court Dissents and Constitutional Developm
Legal information and research resources from The Ohio State University's Michael E. Moritz Law Library